<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Vanity Lighting 101</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.rejuvenation.com/stories/vanity-lighting-101/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.rejuvenation.com/stories/vanity-lighting-101/</link>
	<description>Classic Light Fixtures and Restoration Hardware by Rejuvenation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2013 15:19:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: MJ</title>
		<link>http://blog.rejuvenation.com/stories/vanity-lighting-101/#comment-554</link>
		<dc:creator>MJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2011 18:50:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rejuvenation.com/?p=850#comment-554</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Very humourous post from a male perspective!  Altho I&#039;m all for ergonomic design and planning design for future usage, but, as a woman, I am really hoping to avoid having to shave a double chin or having to worry about a receding hairline at anytime in the near future.

That said, I really have a conundrum with lighting planning in the main bathroom vanity area in our 1949 home because the width of the vanity (currently being 49&quot; which is too small for a double sink and has a similar length mirror is needed for a family of 4) and the poor side-lighting that would result.  I have checked your website for ideas on how to deal with this (especially the &quot;other view&quot;) but the photos often feature pedestal sinks and/or a narrow medicine chest, not this size of vanity.

So I continue my plea to be dazzled with a suitable circa 1949 above-vanity fixture by the end of 2011!  (Our bathroom reno occurs in spring 2012!)  Thx!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very humourous post from a male perspective!  Altho I&#8217;m all for ergonomic design and planning design for future usage, but, as a woman, I am really hoping to avoid having to shave a double chin or having to worry about a receding hairline at anytime in the near future.</p>
<p>That said, I really have a conundrum with lighting planning in the main bathroom vanity area in our 1949 home because the width of the vanity (currently being 49&#8243; which is too small for a double sink and has a similar length mirror is needed for a family of 4) and the poor side-lighting that would result.  I have checked your website for ideas on how to deal with this (especially the &#8220;other view&#8221;) but the photos often feature pedestal sinks and/or a narrow medicine chest, not this size of vanity.</p>
<p>So I continue my plea to be dazzled with a suitable circa 1949 above-vanity fixture by the end of 2011!  (Our bathroom reno occurs in spring 2012!)  Thx!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  blog.rejuvenation.com/stories/vanity-lighting-101/feed/ ) in 0.56695 seconds, on May 23rd, 2013 at 10:35 pm UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on May 23rd, 2013 at 11:35 pm UTC -->